Your transformation strategy is sound.
But can your organization actually execute it?
SOM/TFF gives CIOs, CFOs, and Managing Directors the diagnostic layer that answers the question every transformation leader faces but rarely has data for.
The Problem
What you're dealing with
that nobody can quantify
Enterprise transformation programs fail at a predictable rate, and the failure is rarely the strategy. It's the structural inability to carry it.
The executive team is aligned. The organization isn't.
Mandate travels down from the top, and quietly dies somewhere in the middle. By the time you see the symptoms, 6–12 months of drift have already occurred.
Decisions happen, but slowly, or not at all.
Decision authority is unclear, contested, or concentrated at the top. The organization spends more energy navigating internal approval than executing the work.
Your leaders tell you one thing. Your data tells you another.
The perception gap between executive scores and operational reality is the most reliable predictor of transformation stall. You're likely flying with an inaccurate instrument panel.
You're adding AI before the governance foundation can hold it.
Digital and AI investments land in structurally unprepared organizations every day. The technology works. The organization can't absorb it. The investment stalls or fails.
The Instruments
What SOM/TFF actually measures for you
Each instrument targets a specific dimension of organizational governance health. You choose which ones are most relevant, or run the full suite for a constitutional picture.
The Deliverables
What you walk away with
Every engagement produces outputs that are immediately usable, not a report that sits on a shelf.
📊
Constitutional Health Dashboard
A full-suite view of your governance health across every dimension you assessed, scored, classified, and visualized for executive presentation.
🎯
Perception Gap Report
Side-by-side analysis of how executives, senior leaders, and operational teams score each dimension. The gap itself is the diagnosis, it tells you exactly where the disconnect lives.
🔍
Single Lever Identification
"If you fix one thing", every assessment surfaces the single highest-leverage intervention point. Not a list of twenty recommendations. One lever, clearly identified.
🗺️
90-Day Remediation Roadmap
Prioritized action plan organized by urgency and constitutional pillar. Designed for execution, not documentation. Custodian-reviewed before delivery.
📈
TIS Integrity Score
A composite governance integrity index that gives you a single number representing organizational health, with component breakdown for Integrity, Stability, Drift, and Proof.
🔄
Baseline for Future Measurement
Every engagement creates a constitutional baseline. Your second assessment measures change, not just state, giving you a governance trajectory, not just a snapshot.
The Shift
What changes after an engagement
Before
You know transformation is stalling but can't explain why with data
Executives and front-line teams describe the same organization differently, and you have no way to reconcile it
Mandate is assumed to be clear because you stated it clearly
AI and digital investments are approved on technology merit, not governance readiness
Board reporting on transformation health is narrative, not measured
You fix twenty things and still don't know if you're moving the needle
After
You have a scored, classified, multi-respondent view of what's structurally blocking execution
The perception gap is quantified, you know exactly where the interpretation divergence lives
Mandate transmission integrity is measured from executive to operational layer
AI investments are deployed into environments that have been assessed for governance readiness
You have a TIS score that translates governance health into a single boardroom-ready metric
One lever identified. One intervention prioritized. Measurable change trajectory established.
See It Live
Watch governance compute in real time
A live platform demonstration running a healthy enterprise scenario. Sovereignty, Order, and Mandate scores compute as respondents submit. No staging. No editing.
"Mandates don't fail at the top. They die in the middle. SOM/TFF is the first instrument I've seen that actually measures where the transmission breaks, not just that it broke."
— From the SOM/TFF Doctrine · Terry L. Dickerson, Custodian Seal #001
Ready to Start
Know what your organization can actually carry.
Enterprise engagements start at $15K for a 30-day assessment. Every engagement includes Custodian-reviewed outputs within the engagement window.